Re: Has Popeye-X Finally Fallen? or Has Tacki Finally Flipped Her Lid?

what the fuck is she talking about?From:                  
Remote Name:
Date: 6/8/00
Time: 11:25:55 PM

>>from ppx's previous post<<
From: oTTo Remote Name: Date: 6/8/00 Time: 10:36:48 PM
199.224:::How interesting. You changed your post to make me look like a liar.
216.198:::Excuse me? I most certainly did no such thing! Since when did you NOT "look like a liar", anyway? Perhaps I struck a nerve, eh? I wouldn't want to have anything to do with you, even if I were a lesbian!

*199.224* Unfortunately for you, I printed out the original message. (The proof you said I didn't have.)

*216.198* I don't see anything unfortunate about it at all. Anybody can print out anything they want, any time they want, besides, you never SHOWED ME the proof, did you? (Its the proof I STILL say you don't have, so nothing has changed at all.)

*119.224* In part, it says "Tacki Fishkebob is always 199.224. ANYTIME it says 199.224, the message was posted from Traci Kishbaugh's computer."

*216.198* Every sentence is true. Where's the supposed lie? The "always"? Tacki Fishkebob WAS always 199.224... always until that post, and I've been checking Tacki's posted IP#'s since the Fray, August '99. Every single check I ever did was 199.224, so I didn't even come close to "lying". Show me ONE example ANYWHERE it WASN'T 199.224!>>

209.74: The lie comes in when you changed THIS post about 199.224 being Traci..... at first you said 199.224 is ALWAYS Traci. But then after I called you on that lie, you then re-wrote the same exact post so it would say 199.224 OR 209.74 is Traci just because you think I am Traci. Then you called me a liar and told me to re-read my own post. Remember the "Your problem is quite obvious" post? You called me a liar basically because I called you on the 209.74 thing since it was NOT in the original post. THAT is why I called you a liar. Because you changed your original post to make it look like I was someone I was not.

*199.224* Your original message never had anything about 209.74 before I caught you in your lie, and now it does. Try getting yourself out of this one.
>>*216.198* EXACTLY! If the "original message never said anything about 209.74", how can it be a lie? I NEVER said it, right?>>

209.74: Because you CHANGED the message...... see above, airhead!

>>You can't catch me in a lie I NEVER told, can you? So, I don't have anything to get myself out of, do I? It was just your erroneous assumption, which is not my responsibility. If your thoughts turn out to be untrue, that's clearly YOUR OWN fault. My words did not deceive you, your mind deceived itself, the fact that you call me a liar for something you said I didn't ever say, is proof that you are the one who's lying about me lying, and the one who is willing to lie to cause trouble is YOU.>>

209.74: What you have to get yourself out of is the fact that you changed that post AFTER my post, and it was done to make me out to be a liar.

*199.224* All you want to do is cause trouble, even if you have to lie to do it.
<<*216.198* Apparently I have you to WANT it for me. You say I want to "cause trouble"... What trouble? I would think NOT saying something would be no trouble at all, and obviously, I don't have to lie to "cause" NOT saying something, do I? All I have to do is NOT say it, which is no trouble at all. I wasn't even aware I "didn't" say it until you brought it to my attention, so my first exposure to it was FROM you. Therefore, you must have "caused" it, because, like YOU said, I never mentioned it, or even knew about it, did I?>>

209.74: But you DID know about it and you DID do it. Do you think computers can re-type a message? You retyped it to include the new IP to make it look like I was someone I am not. THAT is the lie!

*199.244* You just never planned on getting caught.
<<*216.198* That is very true. Since I never said it, and I never knew I didn't say it, obviously I would have "never planned" on any repercussions coming from it. The fact is, I never knew about it AT ALL. Your post as 209.74 was the first time I ever caught wind of it, so what was the "LIE" I was caught telling? You don't get to 'catch me doing' something until AFTER I do it, correct? As soon as you informed me that there was another IP#, I looked on that exact same page you said it to me on, and up by the blank space, where your name WASN'T typed, I looked, and sure enough, there it was, But that was the FIRST time I ever heard of it, or laid eyes on it... all of it AFTER you 'caught' me! So, I ran my own tests to check for PROOF of the 209.74 'theory', and my server log confirmed that 209.74 was not only in there, but behaved identically to 199.224. (And I do mean IDENTICALLY, Tacki! You are truly a creature of habit, maybe even Y2K's Poster Child For Mindless Repetition.)>>

209.74: How could you not know about it when YOU posted it? Please give us all a break and stop lying. You posted the change before I even posted my message, so you obviously knew about it. And once and for all, I am NOT Tackie!

prev::: TT :::next

back to the top

P. S. Traci, no joke, your mind reads something like a Stephen King novel, its pure horror from beginning to end.



21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 X 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1